README: Please download and view file in Notepad text editor for better view of tables TABLES OF CUE PHRASES TABLE 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- event1 preceded by phrase | phrase in between events 1 & 2| event2 followed by phrase -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ no complaints of | or | \ showed | adjacent to | \ revealed | versus | \ | and | \ | with | \ | but also | \ | / | \ to control | and was | \ had | but had no | \ due to | question of | \ secondary to | exacerbated by | \ secondary to | attributed to | \ due to | due to | \ improved | continues to have | \ decrease in | and | associated with | cause of | could have exacerbated | | source of | due to | | source of | but showed | | if | or | worsen | R develops worsening of | and | | E to demonstrate | began to produce | | T | and | improved after | U | subsides | goes down | R given | to help prevent | (future) | N attributed to | and / or | | | induced by treatment and | | R | with treatment , | | E showing | and resolution of | | L test revealed | and test showed | | A test showed | and question of | | T has been getting | and also has | | I for treatment of | with | from test | O demonstrated | followed by | | N revealed | as well as | | = had | recently diagnosed with | | NPP have | develop | | admitted with | and developed | | stated | denied | | | despite treatment.*test was | | presents with | and | | chief complaint | and | | were positive for | being sensitive for | | as well as | as well as | | showed (the) | and | (the) | felt that | and | due to | to assess | and | | and | and found.*treatment were | | had | treated with.*followed by | | for test of | and | | transformation of | to | | secondary to | and | | history of | and | | found to be growing | test growing | | treatment titrated for | and | | patient had | with | | show signs of | treatment for likely | | presence of | and | | could represent | complicated by | | | and more | | but had | and | on test / and | on test with | / | secondary to treatment | / been having | and | for approximately / has had | and | for / who presents with | and | / developed | in particular | / treatment for | with a question of | / with | and small amount of | / also had | given risk for | / given risk for | into | / with |presumed secondary to.*given for| / associated with | or | / probability for | with | / treatment for | given hx of | / -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Notes for TABLE 1: 1) Table of discontiguous cue phrases (where each row in the table = a discontiguous cue phrase), with position of the phrase relative to an event is indicated by the column name it is listed under. 2) Each discontiguous cue phrase forms a rule condition which if satisfied cues relation *NPP* between paired problem events. 3) Phrases enclosed within parenthesis are matched with the string of the event TABLE 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- event1 preceded by phrase | phrase in between events 1 & 2| event2 followed by phrase --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ concern of | with probable | \ | may reflect | \ | = of | \ | = from | \ | = given | \ | w/ resultant | \ | with a question of | \ | = causing | \ | ultimately in | \ | with or without | \ | likely | \ | = without | \ | = for many years without | \ | could be | \ | = which was | \ | = which appear | \ | seen with | \ | = : | \ | = - | \ | = - possible | \ | containing | \ | = to suggest | \ | suggesting | \ | their possible relationship to| \ | their relationship to | | evaluate for | and | were seen | | with | (some) | admitted for | found to have | | treatment for | found to have | | noted to have | with | | noted to be | with | | c / o | , | | started | when she first experienced | | started | when he first experienced | | was noted | and revealed | | R from | with | | E | on test with | | T | = later identified as | | U complaints of | with | | R treated for | but | continued to | N - | seem | | grew out | was treated for | | R has had | and test demonstrated | | E demonstrated | at the site of | | L demonstrated | but no | | A demonstrated | felt to be | | T showed | with concerns for | | I c / o | , | | O | on test with | | N remarkable for | , | | = |started.*when he first experienced | | PIP |started.*when she first experienced| | | was noted.*and revealed | | | - w/ | | | -.*to have developing | | (disease) | status post | | (disease) | s/p | | became | after | | with | that was | | signs of | after | | | since \\d+.*but test in | | given the likely | of | | | leaving | | |currently on treatment.*complicated by| | because of | at the time of | | due to | = by | | evaluate for | potential cause of | | attributed to | as a result of | | | thought to be | | | revealed to be | | | however , given | | with regards to | there was | | amount of | from | | | = comprised of | | signs of | such | | | causing | | upon | appeared to be | | show | at the area of | | at the area of | , so | | | = ; | was controlled | | there was | associated | episodes of | and | | according to test included | with | | the etiology of | which did not suggest | | | was noted to be | | had | consistent with either | | presumably because of | and | | was problem-present with | = , which was | | there was | with | , but no | felt to be | since test was | | | = ( | ) | given | and | | given | history of | | with history of | with | on admission | | raised the question of | | a history of | a history of | | in | presumed to be | | | = as a possible source of | | became positive and | is | | | experiences.*as | | developed | which has been | | with | associated with | | was | as there were | | likely has | owing to | | for possible | associated | | had | remained | | who has | has had a h/o | | probable | causing | | | with history of | | may be secondary to | may be secondary to | | notice | from | | + | c / w | | for presumed | / | | | which are characterized by | | has had | without | | is no | to suggest | | | suggests either | | etiology of | thought possibly secondary to | | | = was intact without | | | = at | / was in | and a diagnosis of | / with | which was | / | = given | / had | from the combination of | / | = positive | / | = from possible | / | = that is | / | = - this is | / h/o | and subsequent | / had had | and ultimately | / | r / o | / occasionally gets | when | / complicated by | due to | / | in the setting of | / | = in association with | / | without any progression to | / in association with | concerning for | / | considered as cause for | / | judged to be | / | = which is | / | = , such as | / became | in the setting of | / contains | resulting in | / ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Notes for TABLE 2: 1) Table of discontiguous cue phrases (where each row in the table = a discontiguous cue phrase), with position of the phrase relative to an event is indicated by the column name it is listed under. 2) Each discontiguous cue phrase forms a rule condition which if satisfied cues relation *NPP* between paired problem events. 3) Phrases enclosed within parenthesis are matched with the string of the event. 4) If a cue phrase is preceded by "equal to" sign (i.e. =) then the particular phrase spans its corresponding position in the text relative to the events exactly.